![smartsvn vs tortoise smartsvn vs tortoise](https://i.stack.imgur.com/iW0tP.png)
Basically, make sure you have libsvn-java installed and run the following:Įclipse -os linux -vm /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/bin/java -vmargs =/usr/lib/jni I finally got it working after working on this for a large part of the day (downloading eclipse updates is a very slow process). In this case Eclipse would be using the Sun's JVM (if installed) and subclipse would hopefully work.
SMARTSVN VS TORTOISE INSTALL
Otherwise the only option I have left is to download and install eclipse in the manner you used and described. I just wonder if someone succeeded to get "Ubuntu's" Eclipse and subclipse working together. I then browsed the net, to get an answer and I discovered that subclipse doesn't work right with Eclipse which is natively compiled with GCJ (Eclipse in Ubuntu repository is natively compiled). I succeeded downloading subclipse but when I want to use it, I get a ClassNotFoundException (for example when I want to access "SVN repository browsing" perspective). Thanks for the reply however I don't think this is the problem.
SMARTSVN VS TORTOISE PLUS
(This is a nice feature coz it means it's easy to use different installation folders and therefore have available several different versions of Eclipse, plus RAD or other suite based on Eclipse.) Eclipse doesn't require any other installation step than perhaps creating a shortcut for launching it. Also make sure you've got correct proxy settings, without which your download won't even start (for many people, the default blank proxy settings work OK).įor myself, I've simply used the Eclipse download and upacked the tarball into /opt/eclipse or similar location. (Off-topic) Make sure you've got write access to the Eclipse installation folder, especially to the sub-folders called 'plugins' and 'features'.
SMARTSVN VS TORTOISE PRO
It isn't open source and the Pro version is not cheap (IMO) but I expect the Foundation version will be useful to me. It feels a bit like WinCVS to use (albeit it looks quite different and the SVN paradigm is of course different from CVS). It is good, but it's only useful to Eclipse users and I can't recommend it as a general SVN client.Īs a general-purpose SVN client, SmartSVN looks promising - I've just been trying out the SmartSVN Foundation version (free as in free beer). I found this thread having asked the same question myself. For most tasks, it is sufficient for my needs, though I am no fan of reading unified diffs. I also like using the command-line client. I like using Kompare as the diff tool, too. Kdesvn - it integrates well with konqueror, but I like using the stand-alone client. This would be ideal, and similar in functionality and integration to Tortoise. I have not tried the Nautilus svn scripts that are out there, although I'm very curious to know if they work. I have to use this for all my svn needs (even non-eclipse projects) since it's the only svn client I could get to work, other than the command line client. When I open it it repeats some message ("get files. Tried to install latest version via tarball, but couldn't get the make to complete.Įsvn - looks ok, but seems to be buggy as well. Seemed to be very buggy, did not parse the svn repository contents correctly, and was clugy overall. RapidSVN - Got this from the ubuntu repository. I'm curious to know what everyone is running.
![smartsvn vs tortoise smartsvn vs tortoise](https://www.syntevo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/kde1.png)
Coming from Windows, I'm apparently very spoiled by TortoiseSVN.